Huw Irranca-Davies – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
The below Parliamentary question was asked by Huw Irranca-Davies on 2014-06-17.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what proportion of mango lots or number of shipments infested by tephriditae were rejected by Fera in each of the last five years; and from which source country each infected shipment was exported.
Dan Rogerson
The ban was imposed following persistent interceptions of plant pestson imports of Indian produce into the European Union (EU) and critical reports from the European Commission’s Food and Veterinary Office audits in 2010 and 2013. Despite assurances from India in response to these reports the level of interceptions remained high. The EU’s decision to introduce a ban was therefore fully justified and supported by all Member States including the UK, in line with our policy of strengthening plant health controls. Therefore, no alternatives to a ban were considered by Defra.
Protecting plant health is a key Defra objective. Plant pests and diseases such as those intercepted from India in recent years can cause serious damage to the UK glasshouse industry which is worth over £300 million per annum. However, I am aware of the importance of the mango trade and Defra officials are liaising with the Indian High Commission on what support the UK can offer to India to help it ensure compliance with EU import requirements.
The following table shows the number of consignments of mangoes imported into the UK in the last five years which were infested with Tephriditae (and therefore rejected) by country of origin. The European Commission is considering similar measures to those taken against India for other countries with high levels of interceptions of plant pests. Such consideration takes account of findings from all Member States, and covers all plant commodities and all pests identified.
Year |
Country of origin |
No. of consignments imported into the UK |
No. of consignments infected with Tephritidae |
2010 |
Dominican Republic |
351 |
1 |
|
India |
1977 |
1 |
|
Jamaica |
228 |
3 |
|
Pakistan |
3302 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
Dominican Republic |
417 |
2 |
|
India |
1836 |
11 |
|
Jamaica |
262 |
3 |
|
Pakistan |
3690 |
19 |
|
Puerto Rico |
1 |
1 |
|
Sri Lanka |
144 |
1 |
|
Uganda |
138 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
2012 |
Bangladesh |
146 |
1 |
|
Brazil |
445 |
1 |
|
Costa Rica |
70 |
2 |
|
Dominican Republic |
606 |
18 |
|
Ghana |
628 |
15 |
|
India |
3448 |
23 |
|
Jamaica |
332 |
24 |
|
Kenya |
2044 |
4 |
|
Pakistan |
5128 |
81 |
|
Philippines |
12 |
2 |
|
Sri Lanka |
189 |
10 |
|
St Lucia |
50 |
1 |
|
Thailand |
1050 |
3 |
|
Uganda |
104 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
2013 |
Brazil |
316 |
3 |
|
Dominican Republic |
756 |
16 |
|
Ghana |
357 |
4 |
|
Guinea |
7 |
1 |
|
India |
3563 |
13 |
|
Jamaica |
516 |
17 |
|
Kenya |
1654 |
17 |
|
Pakistan |
5910 |
47 |
|
Puerto Rico |
104 |
1 |
|
Sri Lanka |
111 |
3 |
|
U A E |
1 |
1 |
|
Vietnam |
77 |
1 |
|
|
||
2014 (to 18/06/14) |
|
||
|
Brazil |
106 |
1 |
|
Dominican Republic |
420 |
3 |
|
Ghana |
271 |
1 |
|
India |
401 |
1 |
|
Jamaica |
464 |
9 |
|
Kenya |
698 |
7 |
|
Mexico |
61 |
1 |
|
Senegal |
4 |
1 |
|
Sri Lanka |
69 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
Source: Fera and Europhyt