– 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

The below Parliamentary question was asked by on 2015-01-15.

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answers by Viscount Younger of Leckie on 12 November 2013 (WA 113–4), by Earl Howe on 30 October 2013 (WA 259) and 22 January 2014 (WA 128–9), the Written Statement by the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Public Health, Jane Ellison, on 17 December 2014 (HC Deb, cols 96–7WS) and the Written Answer by the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Public Health, Jane Ellison, on 12 January 2015 (HC220181), whether section 3ZA(4)(b) of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 (as amended) and paragraph 1(4) of Schedule 2 (activities for which licences may be granted: licences for treatment) would already permit spindle-chromosomal complex transfer or pronuclear transfer to be licensed for use in treatments on the basis of their various statements that neither the nuclear DNA nor the mitochondrial DNA of eggs or embryos would be altered by virtue of using these techniques; if so, what is the purpose of the proposed regulations 4(a)–(c) and 7(a)–(c) of the Draft Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Mitochondrial Donation) Regulations 2015 for otherwise proscribed procedures if no nuclear or mitochondrial DNA of any cell of the embryo has been altered”; or if not

Earl Howe

The Department is confident that the Draft Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Mitochondrial Donation) Regulations 2015 have a sound legislative base in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, as amended.